Bring the components together.

Two workspace arrangements using the revised sidebar, chart, chat, sources, and study route.

Local design controls only. No messages, runs, trades, or provider calls.

sherpa / personal workspaceARTBOOK STUDY

RESEARCH / ALLOCATION REVIEW

Put the question in context.

Compare scenarios, inspect sources, and keep the working note close.

Draft study

SCENARIO A / NORMALIZED INDEX

116.0

+16.0 from baseline 100

1W1M3MAll

Scenario AScenario B

Day 18 sampleA 112.0B 106.4

24 observations · Shared 24-observation fixtureStatic inspection state

Evidence notebook03 items

01

Question and horizonWorking draft · v01

NOTE

Define the question and compare both scenarios over the same horizon.

02

Scenario assumptionsSynthetic values · 24 observations

TABLE

Both series start at 100. This table is a design fixture, not market data.

03

Sources to reviewExample references · not reviewed

LIST

Record the source, date, and claim before drawing a conclusion.

Example content · expand an item to inspect

Research thread

01 note

YOU

Help me compare two allocation ideas. Start with assumptions and sources.

RidgeResearch guide

EXAMPLE

Let’s put the two ideas on the same footing. The note below separates the question, assumptions, and evidence.

01 Set the time horizon02 Compare on the same basis03 Flag what needs checking

Comparison note3 sections · Draft v01⌄

RESEARCH NOTEv01

Compare the question first.

01

Question

How do the two ideas differ over the same time horizon?

02

Assumptions

Use the same baseline. Record costs, constraints, and missing inputs.

03

Evidence to review

Check each claim against its source before forming a conclusion.

Working draftIllustrative content

CONTEXT[1] Example source[2] Working note

Continue the conversation

＋ Attach contextResearch ⌄↑

Visual study · no messages are sent

Source cards and artifact previews expand locally. Values, sources, and progress are fixtures. Browser rendering remains unverified.